Ten Reasons for Blockchain Law Literacy

Why should law students become familiar with blockchain technology?

As a law professor, I know that the most popular faculty recommendations for new law students are: guides to studying, exam-taking, and career success; biographies of lawyers and judges; novels like “To Kill a Mockingbird” and “Billy Budd”; surveys of American legal history; and discussions of current social concerns.

But the graduation gifts that I sent in May to a friend’s law school-bound daughter included two other items: New York Court of Appeals Judge (and future Supreme Court Justice) Benjamin Cardozo’s commencement speech, “The Game of Law and Its Prizes,” and an introductory book on blockchain.

Cardozo told Albany Law School’s class of 1925 that beyond “mere knowledge of principles and rules and precedents” they had learned “the ability to think legally” by acquiring “an understanding of the method, the technique, by which the judicial process works.”  (As John Houseman’s Professor Charles Kingsfield would intone in “The Paper Chase” almost fifty years later, “You come in here with a skull full of mush, and you leave thinking like a lawyer.”)

The judge promised that the graduates would soon grapple with “new problems which call for new rules, to be patterned, indeed, after the rules of the past, and yet adapted to the needs and the justice of another day and hour”; and predicted that to create those rules they would have to “be historian and prophet all in one—the qualities of each united in a perfect blend.”

Just such problems, requiring just such perspectives, are created every day by blockchain, through which widely-distributed participants use encryption to pseudonymously register transactions on a secure, decentralized, and universally-accessible online record without relying on a trusted third party like a government or bank to maintain or verify the information.

Today, blockchain is most well-known as the foundation of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.  Despite ongoing speculation—in both senses of that word—on the value of such “altcoins,” even J.P. Morgan Chase’s CEO Jamie Dimon, who publicly questioned Bitcoin’s viability, has acknowledged that “Blockchain is real.”

In at least ten ways, a basic background in blockchain will immediately enhance students’ experiences and opportunities in law school and beyond.

First, the technology’s applications and implications pose practical issues not just in the standard first-year subjects (contracts, torts, criminal law, property, and civil procedure), but across the entire law school curriculum, often connecting several different courses.  For example: which courts have jurisdiction over a fraudulent sale that involves parties in different states (or countries), requires payment in Bitcoin, and is executed automatically by blockchain-based “smart contract” software?

Addressing such questions will inevitably involve analogies to and extensions of traditional legal doctrines (such as the authority of agents) and definitions (such as those of “commodities,” “currencies,” and “securities”).  Students will see the law grow and change, even as they are learning it.

Second, it still doesn’t take too long to read the relevant court decisions and law review articles in this area.  Nor are there very many shelves-full of books on blockchain.

Third, staying current with the tide of developments in the industry and regulation of blockchain—including numerous “white papers” identifying the philosophies, policies, and technologies of developers and trade groups– will help train students to amass, assimilate, assess, and and analyze information in rapidly-evolving situations.  Of particular concern in this context, as in higher mathematics, is the clarification of definitions of core concepts, not only of blockchain and Bitcoin, but also of tokens, securities, and money itself.

Fourth, as detailed in several popular books, the history of Bitcoin provides valuable lessons not only in the emergence of this community’s culture, collaboration, and consensus, but also in the ways in which effective lawyers serve as creative problem-solvers rather than as deal-killers. In particular, these accounts illustrate the lawyer’s role as intermediary among entrepreneurs, lenders, investors, coders, and regulators—and may inspire law students to collaborate on blockchain research projects with colleagues in their university’s business school or computer science department.

Fifth, these issues will spawn a huge amount of transactional work, and certainly  litigation.  When I was in practice, a senior lawyer advised me, “The best clients are rich—and scared.” The rise of blockchain and related financial technology (“FinTech”) not only threatens (and offers opportunities to) banks, but it is widely expected to disrupt current methods of managing supply chains and digital content licensing; health care, mortgage, deed, and insurance documentation; citizen and shareholder voting; and energy distribution.

Sixth, blockchain can also support human rights and social justice work, especially in the area of “financial inclusion”: enabling payments to be made to, and spent by, individuals (including many in developing countries) who have Internet access but not bank accounts.  The technology can also be used to help philanthropies accept, and document their applications of, contributions; to provide secure and private digital identification for individuals, including the homeless; and even to establish voting processes for political elections and in organizational governance.

Seventh, hiring partners, who prize “practice-readiness,” should welcome lawyers who can help their firms use, and help clients use, blockchain and cryptocurrency.  In fact, digital technology might be the one realm in which senior partners readily acknowledge (or presume) the expertise of new associates.

Eighth, those partners should be especially receptive to the intellectual and promotional initiative shown by applicants who have blogged about, or published even short articles about, these emerging issues—or who have created a student group to explore their intricacies.

Ninth, identifying and developing topics for papers and presentations are perfect justifications for entrepreneurial students to contact practitioners and businesspeople, and thereby to start building their own professional networks.  (More information on this process is available in Appendix E of my book, Corporate Governance: Principles and Practices (2nd ed. 2013).) These connections may one day propel students onto corporate boards or into regulatory or in-house counsel positions.

Finally, as Cardozo noted (perhaps a little too modestly), the law school process enables graduates to teach themselves the legal fields that arise after their formal education has ended: “in an envious spirit I contrast my own meager preparation with the copious and varied courses that it has been your privilege to follow.”

However, less commonly appreciated is that law school also prepares lawyers to educate others—be they agencies, courts, opposing counsel, colleagues, or their own clients.  The rise of blockchain offers students numerous opportunities to refine their own powers of explanation, in writing and in presentations, to different audiences.

Half a century ago, in the movie, “The Graduate,” a family friend famously advised Dustin Hoffman’s befuddled Benjamin Braddock: “I just want to say one word to you, just one word. . . Are you listening?. . . . Plastics.  . . . There’s a great future in plastics.  Think about it.”

Law students shouldn’t be waiting to take—or to ask faculty to create— courses in this area.  They should seize the opportunity to start educating themselves.  For today’s 1Ls, 2Ls, and 3Ls, the word is blockchain.

This Web site offers:

  • A list (under the Bookshelf link) of recommended resources (for self-directed study and research, as well as for constructing or supplementing syllabi);
  • Summaries of and/or excerpts from the emerging body of caselaw (Caselaw) concerning blockchain and cryptocurrency;
  • A collection (Research Roadmap) of legal issues and responsive law review articles (and other sources), ordered by field of law;
  • A categorization (Ecosystem) of major types of participants in the blockchain economy;
  • Suggestions (Courses) on selecting law school courses relevant to blockchain practice; and
  • Various questions, opinions, and observations (Blog) about blockchain-related legal issues.

I hope that you find it useful.

Professor Walter A. Effross

American University Washington College of Law

[PDF Version]TenReasons071218